← All rules
SOCLE-CLD-SYS-013// Kernel & network (sysctl)mediumeffective runtime

Limit CPU consumption of the Perf system

Sets kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent = 1 to cap the CPU time the Perf subsystem may consume, protecting system availability.

Checked against the resolved running state (e.g. sshd -T, sysctl, systemctl show), catches drop-ins and Includes a file read would miss. Caveat: runtime ≠ persistence; a value correct now may not survive a reboot.

A pass proves✓ running now✓ on disk✓ survives rebootthe qualified verdict →
Debian 12CIS 1.1.0Debian 13CIS 1.0.0FedoraRHEL 10 / Rocky 10 / AlmaLinux 10RHEL 8 / Rocky 8 / AlmaLinux 8CIS 4.0.0RHEL 9 / Rocky 9 / AlmaLinux 9CIS 2.0.0Ubuntu 22.04CIS 3.0.0Ubuntu 24.04CIS 1.0.0Ubuntu 26.04
One check, maps to 1 standard

Pavois asserts the effective configuration, the live, resolved state, not a file. File-based scanners (OVAL/SCAP, Lynis) miss Includes, drop-ins and runtime defaults; this check sees what is actually applied.

A mapping is a cross-reference to where each standard places this requirement, anchored and cross-validated, not a claim of equivalence. A passing check is evidence toward these references, how to read it.

Why this rule matters

kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent caps the maximum percentage of CPU time that the kernel Perf subsystem may consume handling performance events. Leaving Perf unbounded lets a high (or maliciously crafted) sampling load monopolise CPU and degrade or deny service. Restricting Perf to 1% decreases the risk of availability problems caused by runaway profiling activity.

What Pavois checks

Pavois reads the live kernel value with kernel_parameter('kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent') (equivalent to sysctl kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent), not a /etc/sysctl.d/*.conf line. A file may declare 1 while the running kernel keeps a different value because a drop-in overrode it or the file was never applied. The effective parameter is the only authoritative proof.

describe kernel_parameter('kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent') do
  its('value') { should cmp 1 }
end
describe command("grep -hsE '^[[:space:]]*kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*1([[:space:]]|$)' /etc/sysctl.conf /etc/sysctl.d/*.conf /run/sysctl.d/*.conf /usr/lib/sysctl.d/*.conf /lib/sysctl.d/*.conf 2>/dev/null") do
  its('stdout') { should match(/\S/) }
end

How to verify it is applied

Run sysctl kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent. Expected output:

kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent = 1

Inspect & investigate

No dedicated log line. Confirm with sysctl kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent. When Perf throttles itself because handling exceeded the limit, the kernel emits a warning in dmesg/journalctl -k such as perf: interrupt took too long ... lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate.

Remediation

Pavois's harden plan uses the sysctl resource to set kernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent = 1, persists it in a Pavois-managed drop-in under /etc/sysctl.d/, and applies it live (no reboot). Apply it with pavois harden apply.

Pavois applies this with its own harden engine, the plan below, not a shell script:

keykernel.perf_cpu_time_max_percent
resourcesysctl
value1
pavois harden plan local

where the target is local, a user@host SSH alias, or a container , Docs

Impact & precautions

Risk if not applied: an unbounded Perf workload (intentional or not) can consume excessive CPU, degrading or denying service.

Precautions before applying:

  • This is a profiling/observability trade-off. Capping Perf at 1% means heavy, legitimate perf runs will be throttled and the kernel may automatically lower the sampling rate, reducing profiling accuracy. On dedicated performance-analysis hosts you may need to relax this.
  • No application breakage or lockout risk; the change is fully reversible at runtime.

Standards mapping

StandardReferenceTypeVersionConfidence
ANSSI BP-028R9direct2.0high

Each reference is a cross-reference anchored in the upstream benchmark and cross-validated against the SCAP Security Guide and ansible-lockdown, not a claim of equivalence. Direct = a prescriptive, line-level requirement; supporting = an abstract control family (NIST) the check provides evidence toward. How to read a mapping.

Sources & references